The Still Face Experiment: Why Babies Needs Your Response

Key Takeaways

• Social Awareness: Babies as young as 3 months demonstrate sophisticated social expectations and actively work to maintain connection with caregivers, showing that infants are not passive recipients of care but active social participants.
• Responsive Caregiving Matters: The Still Face Experiment shows that babies experience significant distress when caregivers become emotionally unavailable, highlighting how crucial responsive interactions are for healthy brain development and emotional regulation.
• Digital Distraction: Recent research drawing parallels between parental device use and the “still face” effect suggests that frequent phone checking may create mini disconnection experiences similar to those in the experiment.
• Repair: Perfect responsiveness is impossible, but effective repair after inevitable disconnections may be even more important than avoiding disconnections entirely, helping build resilience in the parent-child relationship.

Download this Article as a PDF

Download this article as a PDF so you can revisit it whenever you want. We’ll email you a download link.

You’ll also get notification of our FREE Early Years TV videos each week and our exclusive special offers.

Get your PDF Download and FREE Early Years TV Updates

Why Your Baby’s Development Depends on Your Response

What happens when a parent suddenly stops responding to their baby? The answer isn’t just academic, it’s a window into how your everyday interactions fundamentally shape your child’s developing brain and emotional security. Dr. Edward Tronick’s Still Face Experiment provides a powerful glimpse into your baby’s emotional world.

In the mid-1970s, developmental psychologist Dr. Edward Tronick designed a seemingly simple experiment that would fundamentally change our understanding of infant capabilities and needs. The “Still Face Experiment” revealed something remarkable: babies as young as three months old not only notice when their caregivers stop responding emotionally, but they actively work to re-establish connection, and show profound distress when those attempts fail.

Dr. Tronick’s Groundbreaking Discovery

The experiment’s setup is straightforward: a parent and baby engage in normal face-to-face play, then the parent suddenly adopts a completely neutral, unresponsive facial expression for two minutes before resuming normal interaction. What happens during those two minutes tells us volumes about infant emotional needs and capabilities.

When faced with their parent’s unresponsive “still face,” babies typically:

• First try to re-engage the parent through smiling, pointing, and making sounds
• Show increasing signs of distress when their attempts fail
• Eventually look away and physically withdraw
• Display signs of emotional dysregulation that can include crying or self-soothing behaviors
• Take time to re-engage even after the parent becomes responsive again

This reaction pattern has been replicated in countless studies across different cultures and contexts (Mesman et al., 2009). The consistency of these findings highlights something fundamental about human development: we are born ready for social connection, and this connection is not just a nice-to-have—it’s essential for healthy development.

Why Responsive Interaction Matters

The Still Face Experiment demonstrates that even very young infants have a sophisticated understanding of social reciprocity. They expect their caregivers to respond to their signals, and they become distressed when this expected pattern breaks down. This finding challenges earlier views that saw infants as passive recipients of care rather than active participants in social relationships (Tronick et al., 1978).

More importantly, the experiment reveals how profoundly babies rely on their caregivers for emotional regulation. When the connection breaks down, babies don’t just feel sad—their entire regulatory system is disrupted. They struggle to manage their emotional state and require the caregiver’s help to regain their equilibrium.

This insight has far-reaching implications for:

• How we understand parent-child attachment
• The importance of responsive caregiving in childcare settings
• The potential impact of caregiver depression or distraction
• How we support parents in developing responsive interaction skills

In the sections that follow, we’ll explore exactly how the Still Face Experiment works, what happens during each phase, and most importantly—how you can apply these insights to strengthen your connection with the children in your care.

Understanding Tronick’s Still Face Protocol: What Happens When Parents Stop Responding

The Still Face Experiment follows a simple yet powerful three-phase structure that allows researchers to observe how infants respond to changes in caregiver responsiveness. This methodology, developed by Dr. Edward Tronick and his colleagues in the 1970s, has become one of the most replicated procedures in developmental psychology research.

The Three Phases Explained

Phase 1: Normal Interaction (2-3 minutes)

During this initial phase, the parent and infant engage in typical face-to-face play. The parent is instructed to interact naturally with their baby, responding to the infant’s cues, vocalizations, and expressions as they normally would. Researchers observe several key behaviors during this phase:

• The parent smiles, talks, and makes animated facial expressions
• The infant responds with their own vocalizations, smiles, and movements
• A rhythmic “serve and return” pattern develops between parent and child
• The infant shows engagement through eye contact and body orientation toward the parent

This first phase establishes a baseline of normal interaction and engages the infant’s social expectations. Most babies show positive affect during this time, with frequent smiles and animated responses to their parent’s engagement (Tronick et al., 1978).

Phase 2: The Still Face (2 minutes)

In the second phase, parents are instructed to suddenly adopt a completely neutral facial expression. They maintain eye contact with their baby but do not respond to any signals the infant makes. During this phase:

• Parents maintain a neutral “poker face” with no smiling or facial expressions
• Parents do not speak, touch, or respond to their baby in any way
• Parents continue to look at their baby directly, maintaining eye contact
• This phase typically lasts exactly 2 minutes, timed by the researcher

Dr. Tronick designed this phase to create a “social violation” – a break in the expected pattern of interaction that allows researchers to observe how infants respond when their social expectations are not met (Adamson & Frick, 2003).

Phase 3: Reunion (2-3 minutes)

The final phase involves the parent resuming normal interaction with their baby. Parents are instructed to re-engage with their infant as they did during the first phase. This reunion phase is particularly important as it allows researchers to observe:

• How quickly the infant re-engages with the parent
• The strategies the infant uses to recover from distress
• Any “carryover effects” from the still face phase
• The parent-infant dyad’s ability to repair the disrupted connection

This three-phase structure creates a powerful “perturbation and recovery” paradigm that has proven invaluable for understanding infant social expectations, emotional regulation, and the importance of synchrony in early relationships (Weinberg & Tronick, 1996).

What Researchers Observe During Each Stage

The Still Face Experiment provides a wealth of observational data about infant social and emotional development. Researchers typically code and analyze specific behaviors during each phase of the protocol.

Normal Interaction Observations

During the first phase, researchers look for signs of mutual engagement and reciprocity:

• Frequency and duration of infant smiling
• Instances of shared attention on objects or activities
• Infant vocalizations and parent responses
• Overall affective tone (positive, neutral, or negative)
• Synchrony between parent and infant behaviors

Most parent-infant pairs demonstrate rhythmic interactions with mutual positive affect during this phase. The infant typically shows active engagement and responsiveness to the parent’s behaviors (Tronick, 2007).

Still Face Phase Observations

The still face phase reveals the infant’s repertoire of social engagement and coping strategies. Researchers document a typical progression of behaviors:

1. Initial solicitation: The infant first attempts to engage the parent using their typical social behaviors (smiling, vocalizing, gesturing)
2. Increased effort: When initial attempts fail, the infant often intensifies their efforts, sometimes using exaggerated expressions or louder vocalizations
3. Wariness and distress: As efforts continue to fail, infants typically show signs of confusion and distress, including frowning, pouting, or crying
4. Withdrawal and self-regulation attempts: Finally, many infants look away, become physically still, or engage in self-soothing behaviors like sucking on fingers

This pattern, known as the “still face effect,” has been consistently observed across different cultures and contexts, suggesting it represents a fundamental aspect of infant social expectations (Mesman et al., 2009).

Reunion Phase Observations

During the reunion phase, researchers pay particular attention to:

• How quickly the infant re-engages with the parent
• Whether negative affect persists after the parent resumes interaction
• The strategies the parent uses to help the infant recover
• Whether the pre-disruption level of positive engagement is restored

Many infants show what researchers call a “carryover effect,” where distress from the still face phase persists into the reunion despite the parent’s attempts to re-engage positively. This suggests that even brief disruptions in social connection can have lasting effects on infant emotional states (Weinberg & Tronick, 1996).

The Research Setting and Methodology

The Still Face Experiment is typically conducted in a controlled laboratory setting to ensure consistency across observations. Key methodological elements include:

• Video recording of all interactions for later detailed analysis
• Precise timing of each phase
• Standardized instructions for parents
• Coding systems to quantify specific behaviors
• Physiological measures (in some studies) such as heart rate or cortisol levels

Over time, researchers have adapted the protocol for different populations and research questions. The experiment has been conducted with fathers, strangers, and even through video screens to better understand the scope of infant social expectations (Adamson & Frick, 2003).

What Your Baby’s Reaction Reveals: Key Findings That Changed Childcare

The Still Face Experiment uncovered remarkable insights about infant capabilities that challenged prevailing views of early development. These discoveries have profoundly influenced our understanding of what babies need for healthy emotional development.

The Surprising Capabilities of Infants

Before Tronick’s work, many developmental theories underestimated the social abilities of young infants. The Still Face Experiment revealed that even very young babies have sophisticated social expectations and emotional responses:

Social Cognition and Expectations

Infants as young as three months demonstrate clear expectations about social interactions. Their distress during the still face phase shows that they:

• Anticipate reciprocal responses from their caregivers
• Can detect violations in expected social patterns
• Actively work to maintain social connection
• Experience emotional consequences when social expectations are violated

This evidence of early social cognition was groundbreaking, suggesting that infants are not merely passive recipients of care but active participants in social relationships from the earliest months of life (Tronick, 2007).

Emotional Regulation Capabilities

The experiment also illuminated the developing emotional regulation system in infants:

• Babies initially attempt to self-regulate when faced with unresponsive caregivers
• They use a variety of strategies, including gaze aversion, self-soothing, and self-distraction
• However, these self-regulation attempts are often insufficient without caregiver support
• The reunion phase shows how dependent infants remain on caregivers for emotional co-regulation

This finding highlighted the critical role caregivers play in helping infants develop emotional regulation skills, a key component of healthy socio-emotional development (Feldman, 2007).

Communication Skills

The varied strategies infants use to re-engage their caregivers during the still face phase demonstrate sophisticated communication abilities:

• Using smiles, vocalizations, and gestures to elicit responses
• Modifying these signals when initial attempts fail
• Communicating distress through facial expressions and body language
• Seeking proximity when other communication attempts fail

These observations helped establish that infants are intentional communicators from very early in life, using a range of behaviors to express their needs and influence their caregivers’ responses (Tronick et al., 1978).

Universal Patterns in Baby Responses

One of the most striking aspects of the Still Face Experiment is the consistency of infant responses across different populations and contexts. This universality suggests that the need for responsive social interaction is a fundamental human requirement, not merely a cultural or individual preference.

Cross-Cultural Consistency

Studies replicating the Still Face Experiment in different cultures show remarkably similar infant responses:

• The basic pattern of solicitation, distress, and withdrawal appears consistently across diverse cultural settings
• Infants from cultures with different caregiving practices still show distress when faced with an unresponsive caregiver
• The timing and intensity of responses may vary slightly, but the fundamental pattern remains consistent

This cross-cultural consistency supports the idea that responsive caregiving meets a universal human need rather than simply reflecting Western childcare preferences (Mesman et al., 2009).

Developmental Timing

The still face effect has been observed across different infant age groups, with some interesting developmental variations:

• Newborns show subtle versions of the still face response, suggesting this sensitivity emerges very early
• Between 3-6 months, the response becomes more pronounced and consistent
• Older infants and toddlers show more sophisticated strategies for re-engagement
• By age 2-3, children verbally question the parent’s behavior during the still face phase

This developmental progression illustrates how the fundamental need for responsive interaction persists while children’s ways of seeking and maintaining connection become more sophisticated with age (Weinberg et al., 2008).

Individual Differences That Matter

While the general pattern is consistent, individual differences in infant responses provide valuable insights:

• Some infants show stronger distress reactions than others
• Some employ more varied re-engagement strategies
• Some recover more quickly during the reunion phase
• These individual differences may relate to temperament, prior experience, or the quality of the parent-child relationship

Research suggests that these individual differences may have predictive value for later social-emotional development, making the Still Face Experiment a potentially valuable tool for early identification of developmental concerns (Moore et al., 2001).

Impact on Our Understanding of Development

The Still Face Experiment significantly advanced developmental science by providing:

• Empirical evidence for the importance of responsive caregiving
• A window into infant social expectations and capabilities
• Insights into early emotional regulation processes
• A methodological paradigm that continues to generate valuable research

The experiment’s findings reinforced and extended attachment theory by demonstrating the mechanisms through which secure attachment relationships develop—through consistent, responsive interactions that form the foundation of healthy socio-emotional development (Tronick, 2007).

The Developmental Science Behind the Still Face Effect

The dramatic reactions observed during the Still Face Experiment are more than just interesting behavioral observations—they reflect fundamental processes in brain development and emotional security. Understanding the science behind these reactions helps explain why responsive caregiving is so crucial during early development.

How Your Responsiveness Shapes Your Baby’s Brain

Recent advances in neuroscience have confirmed what the Still Face Experiment suggested decades ago: responsive interaction directly influences brain development, particularly in regions related to emotional regulation and social functioning.

Neurological Impact of Responsive Caregiving

When caregivers respond consistently to infant cues, they support optimal brain development in several ways:

• Promoting neural connections in areas responsible for emotional regulation
• Supporting the development of stress-response systems
• Establishing healthy patterns of cortisol production
• Encouraging myelination (the process that speeds up neural transmission)

Research using neuroimaging technologies has shown that infants who experience responsive caregiving tend to develop stronger neural networks in regions associated with emotional regulation, empathy, and social cognition (Schore, 2001).

Stress Response Systems

The distress observed during the still face phase isn’t just emotional—it involves physiological stress responses that can be measured through:

• Elevated heart rate
• Increased cortisol (stress hormone) production
• Changes in skin conductance
• Altered respiratory patterns

Studies measuring these physiological responses during the Still Face Experiment have found that even brief periods of caregiver unresponsiveness can trigger significant stress reactions. When these stress responses occur frequently or for prolonged periods, they can affect the development of the body’s stress regulation systems (Tronick, 2007).

This is particularly important because early patterns of stress regulation can have lasting effects on how children respond to challenges throughout life. Responsive caregiving helps establish stress response systems that react appropriately to genuine threats while maintaining equilibrium during minor stressors—a key component of emotional resilience.

Neural Pruning and Experience-Dependent Development

The brain undergoes significant development during the first years of life, with neural connections forming and being pruned based on experience. The quality of caregiver-infant interactions influences which neural pathways are strengthened and which are eliminated:

• Pathways that support successful social interaction are reinforced
• Connections that facilitate emotional regulation are strengthened
• Neural networks that enable empathy and understanding others’ minds develop
• Unused pathways are gradually pruned away

This “use it or lose it” principle of brain development means that early interaction patterns have a formative influence on brain architecture. When infants regularly experience responsive caregiving, the neural pathways that support healthy social-emotional functioning are reinforced (Feldman, 2007).

Attachment Patterns and Emotional Security

The Still Face Experiment provides valuable insights into how attachment patterns develop through repeated interactions between infants and caregivers.

Connection to Attachment Theory

Attachment theory, developed by John Bowlby and expanded by Mary Ainsworth, proposes that the quality of early caregiving relationships shapes children’s internal working models of relationships. The Still Face Experiment illustrates several key principles of attachment theory:

• Infants actively seek proximity and connection with caregivers
• They experience distress when this connection is disrupted
• They use specific behaviors to restore connection
• The quality of repair after disruption influences relationship security

Research has found connections between infant responses in the Still Face Experiment and later attachment classifications. Infants who show greater capacity to recover during the reunion phase are more likely to develop secure attachment patterns (Braungart-Rieker et al., 2001).

The Four Attachment Styles

Attachment researchers identify four main attachment patterns that develop based on caregiver responsiveness:

The Still Face Experiment provides a brief, controlled version of the attachment dynamics that play out in daily life. When caregivers are consistently responsive, infants develop expectations that their needs will be met and their distress will be soothed, the foundation of secure attachment (Ainsworth et al., 1978). Read our in-depth article on Mary Ainsworth here.

Long-Term Impact on Development

The attachment patterns that develop through early interaction experiences have been linked to numerous developmental outcomes:

• Emotional regulation abilities
• Social competence with peers
• Academic achievement
• Mental health outcomes
• Relationship quality in adulthood

Research following children from infancy to adulthood has found that early attachment security (which depends heavily on caregiver responsiveness) predicts more positive outcomes across these domains, though the relationship is complex and influenced by many other factors throughout development (Sroufe, 2005).

The Still Face Experiment helps explain the mechanisms behind these long-term effects by illustrating how moment-to-moment interactions shape infants’ expectations, regulatory capacities, and social-emotional skills—the building blocks of healthy development.

From Research to Real Life: Applying Still Face Insights to Everyday Caregiving

Understanding the science behind the Still Face Experiment is valuable, but the most important question for parents and childcare providers is: “How do I apply these insights in everyday interactions with children?” The good news is that the experiment offers clear, practical lessons for enhancing responsive caregiving.

Recognizing Your Baby’s Connection Bids

Babies communicate their need for connection in various ways, and recognizing these “bids” is the first step in responsive caregiving. Dr. John Gottman’s research on relationships introduced the concept of “bids for connection,” and infants make these bids constantly throughout their waking hours.

Types of Connection Bids

Babies use a range of behaviors to initiate and maintain connection:

• Visual engagement: Looking at your face, following your movements, widening eyes
• Vocalizations: Cooing, babbling, crying, making speech-like sounds
• Gestures: Reaching out, pointing, waving arms
• Facial expressions: Smiling, frowning, pursing lips, raising eyebrows
• Body movements: Kicking excitedly, bouncing, turning toward you

Learning to recognize your specific child’s connection bids is crucial since each baby develops their own unique communication style. Some are more subtle in their bids, while others are more demonstrative (Kim et al., 2014).

The Importance of Contingent Responses

Responsive caregiving isn’t just about responding—it’s about responding in ways that match the baby’s needs and signals. This “contingent responsiveness” happens when:

• Your response timing relates to the baby’s signal (within seconds)
• Your response type matches what the baby needs
• Your response intensity aligns with the baby’s emotional state

Research shows that contingent responses strengthen neural pathways related to social expectations and emotional regulation. When babies learn that their signals consistently lead to appropriate responses, they develop confidence in both their communication abilities and their caregivers’ reliability (Tronick, 2007).

Practicing Attunement

Attunement—the process of tuning in to your baby’s emotional state—supports responsive caregiving:

1. Observe carefully: Notice subtle changes in facial expression, body tension, and vocalizations
2. Wonder with empathy: Ask yourself, “What might my baby be experiencing right now?”
3. Match appropriately: Adjust your own facial expressions, voice tone, and energy level to meet your baby where they are
4. Follow their lead: Allow your baby to direct the interaction when possible

Regular practice with attunement strengthens your ability to recognize and respond to your baby’s unique communication style. This responsive dance creates the conditions for secure attachment and optimal development (Siegel & Hartzell, 2003).

Repairing the Inevitable Moments of Disconnection

Perfect responsiveness is impossible, and everyday life inevitably includes moments where caregivers cannot immediately respond to their infants. The Still Face Experiment teaches us that these moments of disconnection aren’t disastrous as long as they’re followed by effective repair.

The Importance of Repair

The reunion phase of the Still Face Experiment demonstrates that babies can recover from brief disconnections when caregivers re-engage effectively. In real life:

• All caregivers occasionally miss connection bids
• Daily responsibilities sometimes require brief attentional shifts away from baby
• Caregivers sometimes experience their own emotional struggles that temporarily impact responsiveness

What matters most is not perfect responsiveness but rather consistent patterns of repair after these inevitable disconnections (Tronick & Beeghly, 2011).

Effective Repair Strategies

When you recognize that a disconnection has occurred, several strategies can help repair the relationship:

• Acknowledge the disconnection: Even with very young babies, a simple “I’m back now” helps signal your return to connection
• Re-establish physical connection: Gentle touch, holding, or rocking helps reset the infant’s regulatory system
• Use a warm, animated face: Smiling, expressive eyes, and animated facial movements help re-engage the baby
• Follow the baby’s lead in reconnection: Some babies need exuberant play to reconnect, while others need calm soothing

Research suggests that these repair experiences actually strengthen resilience when they occur in the context of generally responsive caregiving. Babies learn that disconnections can be repaired, building confidence in relationship recovery (Tronick, 2007).

Creating a Repair-Friendly Environment

Setting up your environment and routines to facilitate repair helps maintain connection even during busy times:

• Position the baby where you can maintain visual connection during necessary tasks
• Narrate what you’re doing when you need to shift attention briefly
• Build regular connection moments into routine care like diaper changes and feeding
• Create “connection rituals” for transitions between activities

These environmental and routine adjustments make repair more accessible during everyday caregiving challenges (Siegel & Hartzell, 2003).

Digital Distraction: The Modern “Still Face” Challenge

Perhaps the most relevant application of the Still Face Experiment for today’s parents is understanding the impact of digital device use on parent-child interaction. Smartphones and other devices can create “still face” moments in everyday life.

Research on Device Distraction

Recent studies have examined how parental device use affects parent-child interaction:

• Parents check their phones an average of 50-70 times daily
• Device use significantly reduces verbal and nonverbal responsiveness to children
• Children often escalate behavior to regain parental attention during device use
• Even brief device checking creates interaction disruptions similar to the still face effect

This research suggests that frequent device checking may create repeated mini-still-face experiences for babies and young children (Myruski et al., 2018).

Mindful Technology Use

Rather than eliminating technology (which is unrealistic for most families), mindful technology use helps minimize disconnection:

• Designate certain times and spaces as “device-free zones”
• Practice the “tech check-in”—briefly tell your child when you need to check your phone and when you’ll be done
• Position devices where they don’t block face-to-face interaction
• Use technology mindfully during feeding, bedtime, and other key connection points

These strategies help maintain the balance between necessary technology use and responsive caregiving (McDaniel & Radesky, 2018).

Creating Tech Boundaries

Creating clear boundaries around technology use supports consistent responsiveness:

• Set specific times for checking messages and social media
• Use “do not disturb” settings during key connection times
• Consider keeping phones out of reach during special play times
• Model healthy technology use for children

These boundaries help prevent the “still face” effect that can occur with excessive device distraction while acknowledging the reality that technology is part of modern family life (Radesky et al., 2016).

Beyond the Basics: The Still Face Experiment in Professional Childcare Settings

While much of the Still Face research focuses on parent-infant relationships, the insights apply equally to professional childcare and educational settings. Understanding how to implement responsive caregiving principles in group care environments is essential for childcare providers and early childhood educators.

Applications for Nurseries and Educational Environments

Professional childcare settings present unique challenges for implementing responsive caregiving. Multiple children require attention simultaneously, and staffing ratios may limit one-on-one interaction time. Nevertheless, the principles derived from the Still Face Experiment can be adapted effectively.

Creating Responsiveness in Group Care

Strategies for maintaining responsiveness in group settings include:

• Primary caregiving systems: Assigning specific adults as primary attachment figures for specific children
• Small group activities: Breaking larger groups into smaller ones for more individualized attention
• Transition rituals: Creating predictable routines for transitions between activities
• Environmental design: Setting up spaces that allow visual connection even when direct interaction isn’t possible

Research on quality childcare consistently identifies caregiver responsiveness as a key factor in positive outcomes for children in group care settings (Degotardi, 2010).

Professional Development for Caregivers

Training childcare professionals in responsive caregiving techniques improves outcomes for children:

• Videos of the Still Face Experiment can be powerful training tools
• Role-playing exercises help staff practice recognition of and response to connection bids
• Reflective supervision supports caregivers in examining their interaction patterns
• Peer observation can help identify opportunities to enhance responsiveness

Programs that incorporate these professional development approaches show measurable improvements in caregiver-child interaction quality (Biringen et al., 2012).

Supporting Diverse Attachment Needs

Children enter childcare with different attachment histories and needs. Responsive caregiving in professional settings includes:

• Recognizing signs of different attachment patterns
• Providing extra support during transitions for children with attachment insecurities
• Creating predictable routines that build trust
• Working collaboratively with parents to maintain consistency

Understanding the attachment principles illustrated by the Still Face Experiment helps professionals tailor their approaches to individual children’s needs (Riley et al., 2008).

Resources for Continued Learning

The Still Face Experiment has generated extensive research and practical applications. For those interested in deepening their understanding, numerous resources are available.

Professional Development Resources

For childcare professionals seeking to enhance their responsive caregiving skills:

• Training videos: The original Still Face Experiment videos and modern adaptations
• Assessment tools: Measures like the Emotional Availability Scales for evaluating interaction quality
• Professional organizations: Groups like Zero to Three that provide evidence-based training
• Online courses: University and professional development courses on infant mental health

These resources help translate research insights into practical caregiving approaches (Nelson & Bosquet, 2004).

Parent Education Materials

For parents interested in learning more about responsive caregiving:

• Books: Resources like “The Power of Showing Up” by Daniel Siegel and Tina Payne Bryson
• Apps: Programs that support parent-child interaction quality
• Community programs: Parent-infant groups that focus on relationship-building
• Online resources: Websites with evidence-based information on early development

These materials help parents understand and implement the principles of responsive caregiving revealed by the Still Face Experiment (Siegel & Bryson, 2020).

Research Applications

The Still Face paradigm continues to generate important research in areas such as:

• Cross-cultural variations in responsive caregiving
• Neurobiological correlates of social connection and disconnection
• Interventions for enhancing parent-child relationships
• Applications for special populations, including premature infants and children with developmental differences

This ongoing research continuously refines our understanding of how early relationships shape development and how we can best support healthy connections between caregivers and children (Mesman et al., 2009).

By applying the insights from the Still Face Experiment in both home and professional settings, we can support the fundamental human need for responsive connection that begins in infancy and shapes development throughout life.

Putting It All Together: What the Still Face Experiment Means for Caregiving

The Still Face Experiment stands as one of the most powerful demonstrations of just how deeply babies need responsive connection with their caregivers. From Dr. Edward Tronick’s initial observations in the 1970s to present-day adaptations examining the impact of digital distraction, this research provides compelling evidence for what many parents and caregivers intuitively understand: your responsiveness matters tremendously to your child’s development.

Key Takeaways for Caregivers

The experiment’s findings translate into several essential principles for anyone caring for young children:

• Connection builds brains – The responsive back-and-forth interactions you have with infants literally shape neural connections and establish patterns of emotional regulation that can last a lifetime.
• Babies are active communicators – Even the youngest infants actively work to engage their caregivers and maintain connection, using a sophisticated range of signals and strategies.
• Brief disconnections aren’t harmful – Perfect responsiveness is impossible, and the research shows that occasional missed connections don’t cause harm when they’re part of an overall pattern of attentive care.
• Repair is powerful – Your ability to recognize disconnections and re-establish connection may be even more important than avoiding disconnections entirely. These repair experiences build resilience.
• Consistent patterns matter most – What shapes development isn’t any single interaction but rather the accumulation of thousands of daily interactions that create expectations about relationships.

Moving from Research to Practice

The true value of the Still Face Experiment lies not in laboratories but in living rooms, nurseries, and childcare centers—anywhere adults and young children interact. By recognizing connection bids, responding contingently, repairing inevitable disconnections, managing digital distractions, and creating environments that support responsive care, we put this research into meaningful practice.

For parents navigating the demands of modern life, these insights offer both reassurance and guidance. You don’t need to be perfectly responsive, but you do need to be present enough to maintain the dance of connection that supports your child’s optimal development.

For childcare professionals working in group settings, understanding these principles helps create environments where each child can experience the responsive care they need, even within the constraints of group care ratios and routines.

And for students studying child development, the Still Face Experiment provides a vivid illustration of developmental principles that might otherwise remain abstract—showing clearly how momentary interactions contribute to lifelong patterns of emotional and social functioning.

Dr. Tronick’s groundbreaking work continues to remind us of a fundamental truth: human connection is not a luxury but a necessity, particularly in the earliest years of life. By understanding and applying the insights from this research, we honor the profound importance of those first relationships that shape so much of who we become.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Is the Still Face Experiment?

The Still Face Experiment is a research procedure developed by Dr. Edward Tronick in the 1970s that demonstrates how infants respond when a caregiver suddenly becomes unresponsive. The experiment involves three phases: normal interaction, a “still face” period where the caregiver maintains a neutral expression without responding to the baby, and a reunion phase where normal interaction resumes. The experiment reveals infants’ sophisticated social expectations and their distress when caregivers become emotionally unavailable.

How Does the Still Face Experiment Work?

The Still Face Experiment follows a three-phase protocol lasting about 6-9 minutes total. First, the parent and baby engage in normal face-to-face play for 2-3 minutes. Then, the parent adopts a completely neutral facial expression and doesn’t respond to the baby for exactly 2 minutes, maintaining eye contact but showing no facial expressions or reactions. Finally, the parent resumes normal interaction for another 2-3 minutes. Researchers observe and analyze the baby’s behavioral and sometimes physiological responses during each phase.

What Age Are Babies in the Still Face Experiment?

The Still Face Experiment has been conducted with infants ranging from 1 to 12 months of age, with most studies focusing on babies between 3 and 9 months. The classic experiment typically involves infants around 4-6 months old, as babies at this age have developed clear social expectations and engagement patterns but haven’t yet acquired sophisticated language or cognitive strategies for managing emotional distress. The experiment has also been adapted for toddlers up to 2½ years old.

What Does the Still Face Experiment Tell Us About Baby Development?

The Still Face Experiment demonstrates that even young infants have sophisticated social expectations and emotional needs. It reveals that babies: 1) actively participate in social interactions rather than just passively receiving care, 2) experience significant distress when caregivers become unresponsive, 3) use various strategies to try to re-engage caregivers, and 4) need help regulating their emotions after social disconnection. These findings highlight how responsive caregiving supports brain development, emotional regulation, and secure attachment relationships.

How Do Babies React to the Still Face?

Babies typically follow a predictable pattern of responses during the still face phase. Initially, they try to engage the caregiver using their usual strategies like smiling, vocalizing, and gesturing. When these efforts fail, many babies increase their efforts, sometimes becoming more animated or vocal. If the unresponsiveness continues, most babies show signs of distress—frowning, pouting, or crying. Finally, many withdraw by looking away, becoming physically still, or engaging in self-soothing behaviors. During the reunion phase, babies often show a mix of positive re-engagement and lingering distress.

Why Is the Still Face Experiment Important?

The Still Face Experiment is important because it revolutionized our understanding of infant capabilities and needs. It demonstrates that babies are active social partners from early infancy, not passive recipients of care. The experiment provides clear evidence of how crucial responsive caregiving is for emotional development and helps explain the mechanisms behind attachment formation. It also offers practical insights for parents and childcare providers about the importance of contingent responses, the impact of caregiver emotional availability, and the need for repair after inevitable disconnections.

How Does the Still Face Experiment Relate to Attachment Theory?

The Still Face Experiment directly connects to attachment theory by demonstrating how moment-to-moment interactions shape attachment relationships. The experiment shows that secure attachment develops through patterns of attunement, disruption, and repair—when caregivers consistently respond to infants’ signals and effectively repair inevitable disconnections. Research has found correlations between infant responses during the Still Face Experiment and their attachment classifications in the Strange Situation procedure, suggesting that both assess aspects of the same underlying relationship qualities that form the foundation of attachment security.

What About Phone Use and the Still Face Effect?

Recent research has drawn parallels between parental device use and the “still face” effect. Studies show that when parents focus on phones instead of their children, they often display reduced facial expressivity, delayed responses, and diminished emotional engagement—similar to the experimental “still face” condition. Babies and young children typically respond with increased efforts to gain attention, followed by distress or withdrawal if unsuccessful. While occasional device use isn’t harmful, frequent or prolonged phone distraction may create repeated mini “still face” experiences that could impact development over time.

How Can I Apply This Research as a Parent or Caregiver?

You can apply insights from the Still Face Experiment by: 1) Learning to recognize your child’s unique “bids” for connection through facial expressions, sounds, movements, and gestures; 2) Responding contingently—matching your response to what the child needs; 3) Practicing attunement by observing subtle cues and adjusting your interaction style accordingly; 4) Acknowledging and repairing inevitable disconnections; 5) Managing digital distractions by creating device-free times and spaces; and 6) Remembering that what matters most is your overall pattern of responsiveness, not perfect attention at every moment.

Is the Still Face Experiment Harmful to Babies?

The Still Face Experiment is not harmful to babies when conducted properly. The unresponsive “still face” phase typically lasts only 2 minutes—a brief period that causes temporary distress but no lasting harm when followed by responsive reunion. Researchers carefully monitor infants’ distress levels, and the protocol includes resuming normal interaction to repair the connection. The experiment replicates brief disconnections that occur naturally in everyday life. The knowledge gained has greatly benefited our understanding of infant needs, ultimately improving caregiving practices and developmental outcomes for countless children.

References

• Adamson, L. B., & Frick, J. E. (2003). The Still Face: A history of a shared experimental paradigm. Infancy, 4(4), 451-473.
• Ainsworth, M., Blehar, M., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment. Erlbaum.
• Biringen, Z., Altenhofen, S., Aberle, J., Baker, M., Brosal, A., Bennett, S., Coker, E., Lee, C., Meyer, B., Moorlag, A., & Swaim, R. (2012). Emotional availability, attachment, and intervention in center-based child care for infants and toddlers. Development and Psychopathology, 24(1), 23-34.
• Braungart-Rieker, J. M., Garwood, M. M., Powers, B. P., & Wang, X. (2001). Parental sensitivity, infant affect, and affect regulation: Predictors of later attachment. Child Development, 72(1), 252-270.
• Degotardi, S. (2010). High-quality interactions with infants: Relationships with early-childhood practitioners’ interpretations and qualification levels in play and routine contexts. International Journal of Early Years Education, 18(1), 27-41.
• Feldman, R. (2007). Parent-infant synchrony and the construction of shared timing; physiological precursors, developmental outcomes, and risk conditions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(3-4), 329-354.
• Gerhardt, S. (2014). Why love matters: How affection shapes a baby’s brain (2nd ed.). Routledge.
• Kim, S., Fonagy, P., Koos, O., Dorsett, K., & Strathearn, L. (2014). Maternal oxytocin response predicts mother-to-infant gaze. Brain Research, 1580, 133-142.
• McDaniel, B. T., & Radesky, J. S. (2018). Technoference: Parent distraction with technology and associations with child behavior problems. Child Development, 89(1), 100-109.
• Mesman, J., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2009). The many faces of the Still-Face Paradigm: A review and meta-analysis. Developmental Review, 29(2), 120-162.
• Moore, G. A., Cohn, J. F., & Campbell, S. B. (2001). Infant affective responses to mother’s still face at 6 months differentially predict externalizing and internalizing behaviors at 18 months. Developmental Psychology, 37(5), 706-714.
• Myruski, S., Gulyayeva, O., Birk, S., Pérez‐Edgar, K., Buss, K. A., & Dennis‐Tiwary, T. A. (2018). Digital disruption? Maternal mobile device use is related to infant social‐emotional functioning. Developmental Science, 21(4), e12610.
• Nelson, F., & Bosquet, M. (2004). Neurobiology of fetal and infant development: Implications for infant mental health. In A. J. Sameroff, S. C. McDonough, & K. L. Rosenblum (Eds.), Treating parent-infant relationship problems: Strategies for intervention (pp. 47-82). Guilford Press.
• Radesky, J., Miller, A. L., Rosenblum, K. L., Appugliese, D., Kaciroti, N., & Lumeng, J. C. (2016). Maternal mobile device use during a structured parent-child interaction task. Academic Pediatrics, 15(2), 238-244.
• Riley, D., San Juan, R. R., Klinkner, J., & Ramminger, A. (2008). Social and emotional development in early childhood: What every early childhood teacher needs to know. Redleaf Press.
• Schore, A. N. (2001). Effects of a secure attachment relationship on right brain development, affect regulation, and infant mental health. Infant Mental Health Journal, 22(1-2), 7-66.
• Siegel, D. J., & Bryson, T. P. (2020). The power of showing up: How parental presence shapes who our kids become and how their brains get wired. Ballantine Books.
• Siegel, D. J., & Hartzell, M. (2003). Parenting from the inside out: How a deeper self-understanding can help you raise children who thrive. Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam.
• Sroufe, L. A. (2005). Attachment and development: A prospective, longitudinal study from birth to adulthood. Attachment & Human Development, 7(4), 349-367.
• Tronick, E. (2007). The neurobehavioral and social-emotional development of infants and children. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Tronick, E., & Beeghly, M. (2011). Infants’ meaning-making and the development of mental health problems. American Psychologist, 66(2), 107-119.
• Tronick, E., Als, H., Adamson, L., Wise, S., & Brazelton, T. B. (1978). The infant’s response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face-to-face interaction. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 17(1), 1-13.
• Weinberg, M. K., & Tronick, E. Z. (1996). Infant affective reactions to the resumption of maternal interaction after the still-face. Child Development, 67(3), 905-914.
• Weinberg, M. K., Beeghly, M., Olson, K. L., & Tronick, E. (2008). A Still-face Paradigm for Young Children: 2½ Year-olds’ Reactions to Maternal Unavailability during the Still-face. Journal of Developmental Processes, 3(1), 4-22.

Further Reading and Research

Recommended Articles

• Adamson, L. B., & Frick, J. E. (2003). The Still Face: A history of a shared experimental paradigm. Infancy, 4(4), 451-473.
• Mesman, J., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2009). The many faces of the Still-Face Paradigm: A review and meta-analysis. Developmental Review, 29(2), 120-162.
• Myruski, S., Gulyayeva, O., Birk, S., Pérez‐Edgar, K., Buss, K. A., & Dennis‐Tiwary, T. A. (2018). Digital disruption? Maternal mobile device use is related to infant social‐emotional functioning. Developmental Science, 21(4), e12610.

Suggested Books

• Tronick, E. (2007). The neurobehavioral and social-emotional development of infants and children. W. W. Norton & Company.
  • A comprehensive exploration of Tronick’s work including detailed discussion of the Still Face Experiment and its implications for understanding infant development.
• Siegel, D. J., & Bryson, T. P. (2020). The power of showing up: How parental presence shapes who our kids become and how their brains get wired. Ballantine Books.
  • Accessible guide for parents that applies attachment science, including insights from the Still Face Experiment, to everyday parenting challenges.
• Gerhardt, S. (2014). Why love matters: How affection shapes a baby’s brain (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  • Examines the neuroscience behind early relationships and explains how responsive caregiving affects brain development.

Recommended Websites

• Zero to Three (www.zerotothree.org)
  • Provides evidence-based information on infant development, including resources on responsive caregiving, parent-child relationships, and practical strategies for supporting early social-emotional development.
• Harvard Center on the Developing Child (developingchild.harvard.edu)
  • Features accessible explanations of brain development research, including the science of serve-and-return interactions and the impact of responsive relationships on development.
• The Gottman Institute (www.gottman.com)
  • Offers research-based resources on parent-child relationships, including information on emotion coaching and responding to children’s bids for connection.

Download this Article as a PDF

Download this article as a PDF so you can revisit it whenever you want. We’ll email you a download link.

You’ll also get notification of our FREE Early Years TV videos each week and our exclusive special offers.

Get your PDF Download and FREE Early Years TV Updates

Kathy Brodie

Kathy Brodie is an Early Years Professional, Trainer and Author of multiple books on Early Years Education and Child Development. She is the founder of Early Years TV and the Early Years Summit.

Kathy’s Author Profile